MyFundedFutures vs Tradeify

Working verdict: Use MFFU when the first decision is payout rhythm by plan; use Tradeify when the first decision is account type, reset availability, and one-time pricing.

Buying checks

MFFU vs Tradeify by rule consequence

Checked 2026-05-07

MyFundedFutures

Choose by payout plan first

MFFU's main buying question is whether Rapid, Flex, or Pro fits the trader's payout rhythm, buffer tolerance, and news-rule exposure.

• Minimum trading days: 2 days. Evaluation-stage requirements should be separated from funded payout plan checks.
• Activation fee field: $0. Activation and account-status steps should be checked before applying funded path assumptions.
• News trading window: No open positions or orders 2 minutes before and after data releases. Restricted T1 accounts listed in the current field model: Rapid Sim Funded, Pro Sim Funded.

Tradeify

Choose by account type first

Tradeify's main buying question is whether Growth, Select, or Lightning matches the trader's consistency, DLL, reset, and true-cost needs.

• Recurring billing: No recurring billing or monthly subscription for current accounts. Activation fee field: $0 for current account types.
• Trailing max drawdown: End-of-day trailing drawdown; Real-time hard breach. Hitting the Max Trailing Drawdown fails the account permanently
• Daily Loss Limit: Soft breach. Trading pauses for the day, but the account remains active if Max Trailing Drawdown is not hit

Rapid Sim Funded Daily; 24 hours after first trade, with buffer and minimum profit required

Buffer must be cleared before standard withdrawal math is useful

Flex Sim Funded After five winning days; 25K requires $100 net profit days; 50K requires $150 net profit days

After first payout, the Max Loss Limit resets to $100

Pro Sim Funded Every 14 calendar days from first trade; Must meet the plan buffer target before requesting a payout

Withdrawal while in buffer is limited; live transition is review-based

Growth Evaluation 35% in Sim Funded

DLL: Yes; reset: Available for failed evaluations.

Select Evaluation 40% during evaluation only; no funded-mode consistency

DLL: No DLL during evaluation; reset: Available for failed evaluations.

Lightning Funded 20% first payout, 25% second payout, 30% third and later payouts

DLL: Yes, with account-size and legacy exceptions; reset: No reset option.

Cost check Activation

$0 versus Activation fee field: $0 for current account types..

Reset check Different paths

Lightning and Sim Funded paths should not be treated as having the same reset option.

Rule-fit check Plan stage

Do not compare headline price until the account stage and payout path are clear.

Official sources reviewed: MFFU Evaluation Rules, MFFU Activation Fee, MFFU Payout Policy Overview, MFFU News Policy, Tradeify Pricing Reference, Tradeify Trailing Max Drawdowns, Tradeify Daily Loss Limit, Tradeify Consistency Rule, Tradeify Reset Policy. These source-bound fields explain comparison questions; they are not account-specific payout results.

Short verdict

MyFundedFutures and Tradeify should not be compared as two generic challenge prices. The better first question is what can block or reshape the user’s payout path.

MFFU is more naturally checked by plan: Rapid, Flex, or Pro. Tradeify is more naturally checked by account type: Growth, Select, or Lightning.

Compare these first

• Payout rhythm: daily, winning-day based, or calendar-based.
• Activation fee and account cost structure.
• Reset availability and whether failed accounts can be retried.
• Consistency rule timing and whether it applies before or after funding.
• Drawdown and Daily Loss Limit consequences.
• News-window or event-trading restrictions.

What this page does not decide

This page does not rank either firm as universally better. It does not activate a partner recommendation, predict payout approval, or replace current firm terms. Use it to route into the right buying checklist before choosing an account.